About the Journal
JUDIKA (JURNAL PENDIDIKAN UNSIKA) [p-ISSN: 2338-2996 (print) and e-ISSN: 2528-6978 (online)] is a peer-reviewed journal published by the Faculty of Teacher Training and Education of Universitas Singaperbangsa Karawang since 2013. JUDIKA is an integrated media for ongoing communication related to significant new research findings related to education, including: the fields of educational research in teaching, learning and teaching, curriculum development, learning environment, teacher education, educational technology, and education development.
Starting Volume 13 Issue 1 March 2025 JUDIKA moves to a new page at https://journal-ets.unsika.ac.id/index.php/judika. The articles that have been published in Volume 1 Issue 1 2013 until Volume 12 Issue 2 November 2024 can still be accessed on the old page at https://journal.unsika.ac.id/index.php/judika
- Initials: JUDIKA
- Abbreviation: j.pendidik.unsika
- Frequency: 2 issues per year (March and November)
- DOI: Prefix 10.35706 by Crossref
- Online ISSN: 2528-6978
- Print ISSN: 2338-2996
- Editor in Chief: Dr. Mokhammad Ridwan Yudhanegara
- Email: journal.judika@unsika.ac.id
- Publisher: Faculty of Teacher Training and Education of Universitas Singaperbangsa Karawang
- Citation Analysis: Dimensions, Google Scholar
Current Issue
Articles
Peer Review Process
Authors must submit manuscript through the online submission. For being published, the manuscript must go through a peer review process (reviewing process). We only publish articles that have been reviewed and approved by highly qualified researchers with expertise in a field appropriate.
The acceptance or rejection of manuscript submitted by author(s) will be decided by the editorial boards, which is based on the review results. The first screening is the content/scope as well as the novelty from the article submitted, which is done by the editor. After passing the first screening, to get fair reviewing process, our journal usually proceeds each article with at least two reviewers.
There are no communications between authors and reviewers during the reviewing process. Also, there are no communications between authors and editors regarding the rejection decision. Authors whose papers are accepted, revised, rejected will be informed with the results from the editors.
The steps for the reviewing process are in the following figure.
In short, the steps are:
- Manuscript Submission (by author) (route 1)
- Manuscript Check and Selection (by manager and editors) (route 2). Editors have a right to directly accept, reject, or review. Prior to further processing steps, plagiarism check using turtitin is applied for each manuscript.
- Manuscript Reviewing Process (by reviewers) (route 3-4)
- Notification of Manuscript Acceptance, Revision, or Rejection (by editor to author based on reviewers comments) (route 5)
- Paper Revision (by author)
- Revision Submission based on Reviewer Suggestion (by author) with similar flow to point number 1. (route 1)
- If reviewer seems to be satisfied with revision, notification for acceptance (by editor). (route 6)
- Galley proof and publishing process (route 7 and 8)
The steps point number 1 to 5 is considered as 1 round of peer-reviewing process (see grey area in the figure). And, our reviewing process at least goes through 2 round of reviewing process. The journal editor or associate editor considers the feedback provided by the peer reviewers and arrives at a decision. There will be four kinds of editor decision based on the reviewers’ recommendation:
Accept Submission: The submission will be accepted without revisions.
Revisions Required: The submission will be accepted after minor changes have been made.
Resubmit for Review: The submission needs to be re-worked, but with significant changes, may be accepted. It will require a second round of review, however.
Decline Submission: The submission will not be published in the journal.
Editorial Process
